They want to control ALL of the property in the world:https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/Dutch+East+India+Company.pdf
Greetings:
Here are some interesting links and facts as to corporations masquerading as government. You can search for your favorite state, county or local government or legislative court, incorporated.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Does CT CORP SYSTEM own the courts ? Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 12:42:13 -0700 From: Walt To: undisclosed-recipients:;
What in blazes is going on here? What does it all mean? Judges and Courts are companies. And when are we going to put an end to it?
I must sound like a broken record? And does anyone, in this age of CDs, iTunes, MP3s and other digital downloads even know what that means?
Nevertheless, here I go again . . .
Clearfield Doctrine It is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment.” Even if they could, I.C. 59-703 (9) states,“"Public office" means any position in which the normal and usual duties are conducted on behalf of agovernmental entity.”
The Clearfield Doctrine is explicit. The corporation registered and known as THE CITY OF BOISE CITY is listed as a ”CORPORATION” in the IDAHO SECRETARY OF STATE’S BUSINESS ENTITY database and is, therefore, “an entity entirely separate from government.” Notwithstanding any other Idaho Code section that is also superseded by Federal law, the alleged officers are NOT even employees of a “governmental entity.”
“ . . . the government descended to the level of a mere privatecorporationand takes on the character of a mere private citizen .
26
. . For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regardedas an entity entirely separate from government.” Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheat. 22 U.S. 904, U.S. v. Erie Ry Co., 106 U.S. 327;Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
“When governments enter the world of commerce *,they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation.” U.S. v. Burr. 309 U.S. 22; See 22 U.S.C.A. 286e.Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia. 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. Seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103.
An officer is defined as
“a person appointed or elected to a position of responsibility or authority in government or a private organization.” Random House Webster’s Dictionary of the Law, p. 307.
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen.This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it, like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the party upon whom the payment and performance are madeand thereby, willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes. For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” ” Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and takes on the character of a mere private citizen [where private corporate commercial paper (securities) are concerned]“. . . “For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an entity ENTIRELY separate from government.” Bank of US v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904, 6 L. Ed. 24
Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904; 6 L. Ed. 24, (1824), the Court stated, in part: “The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty… exercises no power or privilege which is not derived from the charter.”
"Governments lose their immunity and descend to level of private corporations when involved in commercial activity enforcing negotiable instruments, as in fines, penalties, assessments, bails, taxes, the remedy lies in the hand of the state and its municipalities seeking remedy." -Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241. stare decisis . . .let the decision stand.
27
=============================== Subject: CT CORP SYSTEM
This information was forwarded from a friend and I did some checking . . .
Holy Cow! These are some very bad guys. This is huge. The top of the heap.
Listed as CT CORPORATION SYSTEM on Idaho Secy of State - 1936.
http://www.accessidaho.org/public/sos/corp/C19444.html
Their registered agent is the CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY which is the registered agent for just about every corporation in the country and the world. CT CORP SYS is also a registered agent. Says they're a a foreign (to Idaho) corporation, a Delaware CORP, but Delaware Secy of State's business entity database is closed until tomorrow.
Actually, they are one and the same! The largest in the world!AGENT INFORMATION The Corporation Trust Company Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street
Wilmington, DE 19801 New Castle County (also known as CT Corporation System) http://corp.delaware.gov/agents/a9000010.shtml
More:
*CT*, or the *Corporation Trust Company*, is a wholly owned subsidiary ofWolters Kluwer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolters_Kluwer , a multi-national information services company based inthe Netherlands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Netherlands with operations in over 35 countries. CT is the umbrella brand for two businesses: CT Corporation and CT Lien Solutions. CT Corporation is the largest registered agent service firm in the world representing hundreds of thousands of business entities worldwide.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CT_%28company%29
https://ux-ctadmin.ctadvantage.com/CTAdminUX/CTWebAdmin/Public/Login.aspx
Trying to open their Certificate of Authority but it is taking it's time. Got it. Wowzers! They work for the "Members of the Bar!"
Their address is the same as Eberle, Berlin law firm here in Boise. My ex-brother in law used to work for them.
http://www.eberleberlin.com/contact-us.html
I just pulled out a section of the Certificate (page 2 of the PDF), if
28
it displays correctly, notice it refers to the "Government of the United States" (I have their DUNS number) and "any or all of the states, districts, territories, or colonies of the United States of America." If it doesn't display, I attached the PDF file. WOW! The very next page, with regard to property, refers to the same States etc but they are Capitalized! And they are of the "United States" NOT the "United States of America!" Converted in one paragraph! And just before that they declare what they want to do. To serve Members of the Bar in their plans and plots to own everything, everywhere. And they are doing it.
They want to control ALL of the property in the world. Period. If the
above excerpts do not display, open the attachment and read if for yourself. At the end it says they accepted the provisions of the Idaho Constitution and that acceptance was signed and notarized in New Jersey which is where this predatory corporate velociraptor was founded first in the States. Now they are a Delaware Corp and they are registered to transact business in every State. But they are ultimately based in the Netherlands.
http://www.wolterskluwer.com/Pages/Home.aspx
You can't get past this "Splash page" unless you agree to their "cookie policy." Not me.
"By clicking on ‘ *APPROVE*’, you consent to our use of cookies on this device in accordance with our policy."
Here's the bridge of their ship!
Legal structure
Wolters Kluwer’s ultimate parent company is Wolters Kluwer nv. In 2002, Wolters Kluwer nv abolished the voluntary application of the structure regime (“structuurregeling”). As a consequence, the structure regime became applicable to Wolters Kluwer Nederland bv, which is the parent company of the Dutch operating subsidiaries. Wolters Kluwer International Holding bv is the (in)direct parent company of subsidiaries operating outside of the Netherlands.
Their corporate structure throughout the world is like "Falken's Maze!" The Netherlands is the source of the "mercantile" system. The Merchants. Merchant Law. The Guilds. And yes, the most evil one of all, "The Lawyers Guild."
Look back at the purpose of this megalithic monster: To OWN everything! Everywhere! CT is the "brand" for two businesses, one of which is "CT Lien Solutions." If they can't own it, they'll slap a lien on it.
I need a drink. A double.
29
I think we all need to step back, take a deep breath, consider this demonic Goliath and realize what we are all "up against." I have repeatedly referred to the criminal conspiracy of the Bar association, and have advocated for their abolition, but this is a whole new ballgame. This "umbrella brand" and its "ultimate parent company," Wolters Kluwer nv, involves every corporation, every judge, every attorney in the master plan to take everything they can, from anybody they can, anywhere they can, and to do it "legally."
Jeez.
<<m>>
"History interposes with evidence that tyranny and wrong lead inevitably to decay; that freedom and right, however hard maybe the struggle, always prove resistless."
--George Bancroft, Statesman and Historian (1800-1891)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Look up ct corporation systems on the sec of state incorporated 1892 out of nethrlands for the BAR Have a look at all the "private companies" I found while researching. You may find some of the company "Names" surprising. I did.
http://www.manta.com/mb_55_F307902T_3YH/congress/boise_id
Judges and other private companies, Federal and State. Wowzers!
http://www.manta.com/mb_51_ALL_3YH/boise_id?search=us+district+court&osp=us+d istrict+court+boise+idaho
And did you know that we had a "branch" office of the Supreme Court here in Boise Idaho?
http://www.manta.com/c/mm8l8jc/supreme-court-of-the-united-states
Also found another new website to search on! FIND THE COMPANY!
http://companies.findthecompany.com/l/11742895/Supreme-Court-Of-The-United- States-in-Boise-ID
The US DISTRICT COURT is one of the JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF
IDAHO! HUH?! How is that even possible?!
30
http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportSelectionCmd?dun sNumber=14&busName=JUDICIARY%20COURTS%20OF%20THE%20STATE%20OF%20IDAHO&storeId =11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&address=550%20W%20FORT%20ST&city=BOISE&sta te=ID&zip=837240101&country=US
ALSO TRADED AS!
JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportSelectionCmd?dun sNumber=14&busName=JUDICIARY%20COURTS%20OF%20THE%20STATE%20OF%20IDAHO&storeId =11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&address=550%20W%20FORT%20ST&city=BOISE&sta te=ID&zip=837240101&country=US
Also Traded as UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 550 W FORT ST, BOISE, ID
So . . . what are they trading, and can I buy some?
SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF THE
http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportSelectionCmd?dun sNumber=0&busName=SUPREME%20COURT%2c%20UNITED%20STATES%20OF%20THE&storeId=111 54&catalogId=71154&productId=0&address=550%20WEST%20FORT%20ST%20MSC%20042&cit y=BOISE&state=ID&zip=837240001&country=US
Also Traded as US DISTRICT COURT 550 WEST FORT ST MSC 042, BOISE, ID MSC means "Mail Stop Code" and 042 is the Bankruptcy Court. No way it has ANYTHING to do with the SUPREME COURT. The Bankruptcy Court is an adjunct court created by Congress. The Supreme Court was created by the Constitution!
Excerpts from Northern Pipeline v Marathon Pipeline:
We conclude that 28 U.S.C. 1471 (1976 ed., Supp. IV), as added by 241(a) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1978, has impermissibly removed most, if not all, of "the essential attributes of the judicial power" from the Art. III district court, and has vested those attributes in a non-Art. III adjunct. Such a grant of jurisdiction cannot be sustained as an exercise of Congress' power to create adjuncts to Art. III courts.
The flaw in appellants' analysis is that it provides no limiting principle. It thus threatens to supplant completely our system of adjudication in independent Art. III tribunals and replace it with a system of "specialized" legislative courts
Congress does not have the same power to create adjuncts to adjudicate constitutionally recognized rights and state-created rights as it does to adjudicate rights that it creates. The grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy courts cannot be sustained as an exercise of Congress' power to create adjuncts to Art. III courts.
Marathon sought dismissal of the suit on the ground that the Act unconstitutionally conferred Art. III judicial power upon judges who lacked
31
life tenure and protection against salary diminution. The Bankruptcy Court denied the motion to dismiss, but on appeal the District Court granted the motion.
Held:
The judgment is affirmed.
================== I don't want to be their "customer." <<m>> I remain yours, Pro Libertate Patriae, "For the Liberty of My Country,"
==============================
30
Thank you for your concern on my safety. Whatever the SEC calls those boxes, they are a vital part of the global debt facility. Because of the enormous amounts connected and involved, naked greed makes enemies from friends and many people have lost their lives. It happens that I am, again, the redeemer or legal representative combining with the holder/seller for 30% of the awards/payment in an outward role of arranger yet being in the overall role of asset owner TVM-LSM-666 for 1,181,338.675 metric tons of gold plus such asset commodities, see Entitlement of 1985 and the 1969 Deed of Assignment. Global Immunity is given to holder and redeemer in the attached TREATY OF PARIS.
So far, this should show that I know what I am doing. I accept the fact that people around me do not know. I am also not at liberty to tell them that I might want to receive my money in multiple billions in the Central Bank of the Netherlands. I do not want to go into details to explain why it would be a suicidal mission to have that kind of money in the Philippines. This must be enough. I have no more to say.
Wolfgang
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Karen Hudes wrote: Wolfgang,
It will be hard for humanity to get its gold out of hiding when the authorized signatory is in jail. Viable payment scheme? In other words, you are giving a loan to the Banking Cartel? Who is going to draft and sign the agreement? How do you know you are not going to be treated like Keenan's imprisoned side-kick Nelu? The SEC calls these securities, which are unregistered. I hope you know what you are doing. Can't you do Japan first, and then you would have the protection. This way you are just mincemeat, and so is humanity.
Karen
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:08:19 +0800 Subject: Re: The Philippines! From Wolfgang Struck To: Karen Hudes
Having read this, I must have a real reason why I should not join you in Tokyo on May 17. I am working on something very big. After decades of denial, we have reason to believe that the US Treasury (in connection with WB, IMF, and UN) is now willing to tackle the issue of old Federal Reserve boxes* and pay for it. We started in the assumption that 2% of face value would be paid, that would be $60B per box in an
31
environment where the biggest banks in the world are not allowed to hold accounts of more than $10B in cash. We have delivered detailed lists for 80 such boxes so far. We are willing to let go against a viable payment scheme which would include a few central banks around the world.. I am the arranger between holder/seller party and the party that has the right to sell to US Treasury and I am looking at huge amounts of money coming my way.
You will understand that I cannot go away from this for a while. We hope this will be over before the end of May 2014. I am also held on stand-by for the execution of the gold deal in Wing Lung Bank with China govnmt. Big changes ahead.
Take good care,
WS
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Karen Hudes wrote:
Dear John Arceneaux,
I am happy to talk to the people of the Philippines. The only question is timing. I am very busy preparing for a trip to Tokyo, where we are going to work with the Japanese people to get their gold out of hiding to mint into Yen and also to clean up Fukushima. I will be arriving in Tokyo on May 17th, and could do an interview after then, via skype if you would like. my skype handle is karen.hudes1.
Best, Karen www.kahudes.net
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 22:37:39 +0800 Subject: Fwd: The Philippines! From: Wolfgang Struck To: karenhudes
Karen, you first. I go to sleep in a while. WS
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Arceneaux <kbpstv@gmail.com> Date: Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:00 PM Subject: Re: The Philippines! To: Wolfgang Struck <oskarstruck@gmail.com>
Thank you very much! Dealing with public disclosure is my intention! You are on radio shows everywhere and maybe we can get the news out to the people of the Philippines
32
now! Just tell me what you desire and I will make it happen for you Karen! You are a world wide hero bless you and all the positive people you deal with! Respectfully, John Arceneaux U-6.ME Unite Humanity 1-337-212-3422
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Wolfgang Struck wrote: Karen,
You remember I sent you a 10-page pdf with $3T Uncut Dollar. That was in bw. Now it comes in color and In an up-dated version with Marcos old and sick. With Marcos, the Philippines was the richest nation on earth. They kicked him out or watched when "they" kicked him out. Filipinos were told that Marcos was a dictator. Somehow, they swallowed the bait hook, line, and sinker. I may surely become the enemy of the state if I tell the truth. There is no way I can do that from here. If we can do that in an interview in German and in Germany (which has to be translated) and in a second interview in front of the WB with KH, then we need only one living witness and we have that in Vilma Bautista in New York. I believe strongly that that is the only way to connect with the Filipino people. Their language does not allow abstract thinking. Everything is personal. Likewise, they are not interested in $3T. They will only be interested to get a share, as much as possible, for themselves. They know, though, that the politicos will get everything before them.
We have to stop deforestation in the Philippines which goes on unabated. Alas! You cannot tell Filipino people that when you cut a huge tree, then you cut layers of life colonies under the tree and layers of life in the tree. They only know that someone high up and "untouchable" will pay them a small money when they deliver. And for them, that is better than nothing.
Closer to your heart, we have a Marcos account in Wells Fargo Dallas. $64 Billion since 1976. We leave the capital in the bank and divide the accrued interest for viable projects. Maybe that is your line of business and you can help us. That would be nice and a good investment for your company LPTF.
Greetings,
Wolfgang
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Karen Hudes wrote: Thank you for your offer of assistance. We will get back to you
